After reading Do Coyle’s article, I want to talk about
two topics that appear in the article and that I found interesting.
- CLIL is not teaching what students already know but
in a foreign language.
The idea of CLIL goes beyond learning new vocabulary
in a foreign language. It is learning some contents and skills that are from a
particular subject (that is not language) through a language that is not the
students’ first language.
- CLIL is not a “backdoor” language teaching or
additional subject teaching.
If as teachers think that CLIL is an additional
activity or subject, then students will think the same. Children that consider
that a subject or a lesson is not so important lose their interest on that
learning. As teachers we can evaluate differently each activity or lesson
(depending on the objectives and the evaluation criteria) but that doesn’t mean
that what has been taught is only complementary. Everything that is included in
a lesson plan or in a project has been previously considered and accepted. We
should skip that fact because that can affect on the teaching and learning
process.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario